Back

The cost of non-compliance: Why AML compliance is not just a box-ticking exercise

In a recent disciplinary case, a solicitor was struck off and ordered to pay nearly £30,000 in costs after the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found “widespread and fundamental non-compliance” with anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.  

The breaches spanned six years and included failures in firm-wide risk assessments, customer due diligence, source of funds checks, and proper handling of client money. 

This case is a stark reminder that AML compliance is not just a regulatory requirement—it’s a cornerstone of professional integrity and public trust. Here, we unpack the cost of non-compliance with AML regulations.  

What are the risks of non-compliance? 

The tribunal highlighted that the firm had processed over £8.8 million in unverified funds, posing a direct threat to the legal profession and public safety.  

Clients were left waiting years for the return of residual balances, and misleading information delayed regulatory intervention. The solicitor admitted to all allegations, including dishonesty in confirming compliance to the regulator. 

The outcome? Permanent removal from the profession and reputational damage that no amount of remediation can undo. 

What this means for regulated firms 

AML regulations—particularly the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds regulations 2017—require firms to: 

  • Conduct firm-wide risk assessments (FWRA) 
  • Implement robust policies, controls, and procedures (PCPs) 
  • Monitor transactions and verify sources of funds 

Failure to meet these obligations can result in fines, disciplinary action, and even criminal liability. But beyond the legal consequences, non-compliance undermines the trust clients place in professionals to safeguard their interests. 

At Veriphy, we provide AML compliance solutions that are straightforward and reliable. Our platform supports: 

  • Automated risk assessments 
  • Audit trails for regulatory reporting 

We understand that compliance can be complex—but with the right systems in place, it doesn’t have to be risky. 

This case is a wake-up call for firms across the legal and financial sectors. AML compliance is not a one-time task—it’s an ongoing responsibility. With regulators stepping up enforcement, now is the time to ensure your firm is protected. 

Need support? Get in touch with our team of experts to learn how Veriphy can strengthen your AML processes or take a browse of our solutions and request a free demo to see our tech in action. We even offer learning through our training academy, to help your teams develop their understanding of compliance and its importance.



No summer break for AML enforcements as the SRA issue huge fines

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has made it clear – AML enforcement doesn’t take holidays! In July alone, the SRA …

Insight

Why Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) screening is more critical than ever

In the world of compliance, few areas carry as much weight—and risk—as the screening of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs). A …

Insight

Strengthening sanctions compliance: What the LMA’s new clause means for reinsurers

In a move that underscores the growing global emphasis on sanctions enforcement, the Lloyd’s Market Association (LMA) has released a …

Insight